Dismissed without Prejudice...

.....and that all costs herein incurred be taxed against the plaintiff.

Huh??? What the he double hockey sticks does that mean?

Well is it with prejudice or without prejudice?

So if it is without prejudice, why the cost to the plaintiff?

This from a judge who obviously is not up to snuff on the current labor laws.

And that's all I'm going to say about that.